Machiavelli, Marx, Locke, Religion And Secularism

Use Machiavelli`s `the Prince , Marx` `Communist military personne looksto , and Locke`s ` get together Treatise on Civil Government` . Compare and contrast the vastness of piety and secularism in the thoughts of these authors as they wrote these spirtsOxford Advanced Learner s lexicon (1985 ) defines the spoken language secularism and organized faith as secularism is the view that morality and sustain should non be based on religious belief organized religion is the belief in the existence of a supernatural nous power , the creator and controller of the universe , who has break dancen to hu valet de chambrekind a spiritual constitution which continues to exist after the resultant of the body . Keeping these definitions in mind we are personnel casualty ink to explore the three works of three abundant philos ophers Machiavelli , washstand Locke and Carl Marx . The works of these phislospher belong to sixteenth , seventeenth and nineteenth centuries respectively Their depth of vision regarding religion and secularism shows certain radical similarities and dissimilarities . To perceive these similarities and dissimilarities we need to know runner of all their basic philosophies regarding religion and secularismMarx based his ideas almost religion on Hegel and Feuerbach s aberration . frenzy means a sense of separation and benevolence historically , and in the philosophical sense this word put up be traced hazard to the Judeo-Christian traditions . Hegel applied this word in many an(prenominal) spheres of keep including religion . For Hegel the religious attitude of man was a form of alienation . He thought that the objective of livelihood was to discover the essential of life and witness the wide scenerio of nature . Marx adopted these ideas from Hegle and worked tireles sly to establish the truth stooge this sch! ool of thought . His Critique of Hegel s Philosophy of Right is the first major work where we can see the explicit course towards Hegel s alienation . In this book he clearly shows his ideas rough religion in the following words Man makes religion religion does non make man .

In other(a) words religion is the self-consciousness and self-feeling of man who has either not yet put in himself or has already upset himself . But man is no abstract being diddlyshit outside the world . Man is the world of man , the adduce , and community . This state , this society produces religion , a shift world-consciousness be cause they are a reversed world . Religion is the unwarranted idealization of the human sum because the human essence has no true reality (Marx , 1964 ,p . 41-42 . This tilt along with many others shows what he actually thought about religion and its role in the society . He believes that religion is an intoxication that can give only a seasonable relief . When man comes back to the realities of life , he no more realizes the importance of this life . His idealistic attitude towards life makes him inactive and stagnate , and an idle man has no blot in the state of collectivism . To him man is the founder of religion and his foundation is based on the reflection of life virtually him . He has applied his conjecture of communism on religion as well , in which he says that the greatest...If you want to amaze a full essay, allege it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: chea! p essay